World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://wjon.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 6, December 2025, pages 538-545


Measuring the Unseen Burden: Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Reduce Treatment-Related Time Toxicity in Incurable Malignancies

Figure

↓  Figure 1. TrTT by subgroup. TrTTs were plotted on the basis of the cancer type, treatment type, or ECOG performance score with IQRs (box, between the 25% and 75% quartile value), median (lines within the box), 5th and 95th percentiles (whiskers), and outliers (dots). ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IQR: interquartile range; TrTT: treatment-related time toxicity.
Figure 1.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Summary of the Literature on Time Toxicity in Oncology
 
Author and reference Year of publication Study design Country of study Sample size Study population Time toxicity metric Findings
CCTG: Canadian Cancer Trials Group; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; OS: overall survival.
Guy and Richardson [13] 2012 Payment claim data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey USA 2,470 Any cancer diagnosis Minutes spent with oncologists Mean of 23 min per oncology visit
Ray et al [14] 2015 Analysis using The American Time Use Survey data USA 3,787 Patients with any conditions were included Reported minutes spent seeking medical care per day Mean of 123 min spent per medical visit
Rocque et al [15] 2020 A collection of direct observations, patient survey, and administrative claims USA 132 Metastatic breast cancer Minutes spent Average 7-10% of the initial 3 months of treatment were spent on health care
Bange et al [12] 2020 Retrospective cohort study using medical records USA 362 Metastatic pancreatic cancer Days spent 10% of survival days spent receiving palliative chemotherapy
Gupta et al [16] 2023 Secondary analysis of the CCTG CO.17 trial Canada 572 Advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab vs. supportive care Home days as days spent at home Despite a 6-week OS benefit from cetuximab, home days were equal between treatment and supportive care
Bateni et al [11] 2023 Retrospective, matched cohort study between two historical eras Canada 731 per cohort Stage II-IV melanoma In-person days with health care visits for the 1st year since treatment Average 1 in 7 days for stage IV melanoma
Gupta et al [2] 2024 Retrospective cohort study Canada 5,785 Stage IV NSCLC Health care contact days Median contact days were 36, median weekly percentage of 33.3%
Baltussen et al [1] 2024 Prospective study Mexico 158 Metastatic cancer, ≥ 65 years old Health care contact days within the first 6 months Mean of 21% of days spent with healthcare contact
Gupta et al [17] 2024 Retrospective study using Medicare survey data USA 1,168 Cancer survivors ≥ 65 years old Health care contact days Cancer survivors spent 1 month of the year receiving health care
Kagalwalla et al [7] 2024 Retrospective study using real-time location badge data USA 435 Adult patients with any cancer diagnosis Minutes spent for oncology-related ambulatory care Median oncology clinic time: 119 min per visit
Banerjee et al [18] 2024 Single-center, cross-sectional survey USA 252 Multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation TimeTox+, defined as ≥ 1 contact per week 40% of all multiple myeloma patients were positive for time toxicity
Johnson et al [10] 2024 Retrospective cohort study using the VA Clinical Cancer Registry USA 468 Stage IV gastrointestinal cancer Contact day 1 in 3 days, with a “U-shaped” pattern with an initial peak after diagnosis, and a rise near the end of life

 

↓  Table 2. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients
 
Variable Number of patients, No. (%) Median time toxicity (days/12 weeks), No. (IQR)
ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IQR: interquartile range; PS: performance status.
All patients 150 13 (7 - 23)
Age (years)
  18 - 50 47 (31.3) 18 (7 - 26.5)
  51 - 75 89 (59.3) 11.5 (6 - 22)
  > 75 14 (9.3) 9 (7.3 - 14.5)
Sex
  Male 79 (52.7) 15 (5 - 24)
  Female 71 (47.3) 12 (7 - 21.8)
Primary cancer site
  Breast 20 (13.3) 12 (8 - 21.8)
  Thoracic 35 (23.3) 10 (6.3 - 12.5)
  Gastrointestinal 55 (36.7) 23 (18 - 35)
  Genitourinary 24 (16) 4.5 (2 - 10)
  Others 16 (10.6) 7.5 (4 - 8.5)
Type of therapy
  Cytotoxic chemotherapy 39 (26) 22 (15.5 - 33.5)
  Immunotherapy 24 (16) 7 (4 - 10)
  Hormone therapy 20 (13.3) 3 (2 - 7)
  Targeted therapy 32 (21.3) 8 (3.5 - 10.5)
  Combination therapy 35 (23.3) 22 (17 - 27)
ECOG PS
  0 - 2 112 (74.6) 9.5 (4 - 18.5)
  3 - 4 38 (25.4) 22 (15.3 - 38)