World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://wjon.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 000, Number 000, October 2025, pages 000-000


A Simplified Novel Algorithm to Predict the 21-Gene Recurrence Score

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Proposed PR% and grade in relation to RS. PR: progesterone receptor; RS: recurrence score.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Proposed algorithm to predict Oncotype DX risk category using histologic grade and PR percentage. PR: progesterone receptor.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Results of applying the algorithm to the validation set.

Tables

Table 1. Pathological Features for All Patients
 
FeatureN (%)
ER: estrogen receptor; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; ODx: Oncotype DX; PR: progesterone receptor; RS: recurrence score.
ER (%)
  Positive528 (100%)
PR (%)
  Negative30 (5.7%)
  Positive498 (94.3%)
HER2
  Equivocal (FISH-negative)59 (11.2%)
  Negative469 (88.8%)
HER2 score
  0263 (49.8%)
  1+206 (39.0%)
  2+ (FISH negative)59 (11.2%)
ER (ODx value)
  Negative11 (2.1%)
  Positive517 (97.9%)
PR (ODx value)
  Negative72 (13.6%)
  Positive456 (86.4%)
HER2 (ODx value)
  Equivocal3 (0.6%)
  Negative523 (99.0%)
  Positive2 (0.4%)
Histological type
  Invasive ductal carcinoma438 (82.9%)
  Invasive lobular carcinoma68 (12.9%)
  Invasive mucinous carcinoma10 (1.9%)
  Invasive tubular carcinoma7 (1.3%)
  Invasive cribriform carcinoma1 (0.2%)
  Invasive solid papillary carcinoma3 (0.6%)
  Invasive breast carcinoma with apocrine features1 (0.2%)
Group
  Learning set377 (71.3%)
  Validation set151 (28.7%)
Grade
  199 (18.8%)
  2323 (61.2%)
  3106 (20.1%)
RS
  High96 (18.2%)
  Low432 (81.8%)

 

Table 2. Comparison of Various Variables Between the Learning Set and the Validation Set Showing No Significant Differences
 
FeatureTotal, N (%)GroupsP-value
Learning setValidation set
CI: confidence interval; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; RS: recurrence score; SD: standard deviation.
Grade0.88
  199 (19.2%)68 (18.0%)31 (20.5%)
  2323 (61.7%)231 (61.2%)92 (60.9%)
  3106 (19.0%)78 (20.7%)28 (18.5%)
Actual RS0.54
  High96 (18.2%)72 (19.1%)24 (15.9%)
  Low432 (82.5%)305 (81.9%)127 (84.1%)
Age (years)0.46
  Mean (95% CI)52.8 (51.9, 53.7)53.6 (52.1, 55.2)
  Median (Min, Max)52.0 (21.0, 76.0)53.0 (24.0, 79.0)
  SD10.311.4
ER (%)0.34
  Mean (95% CI)89.8 (88.7 ,91.0)88.5 (86.5, 90.5)
  Median (Min, Max)95.0 (1.0, 100)90.0 (5.0, 100)
  SD13.715.0
PR (%)0.87
  Mean (95% CI)66.4 (63.5, 69.3)67.6 (63.0, 72.2)
  Median (Min, Max)85.0 (0.0, 100)90.0 (0.0, 100)
  SD34.234.1

 

Table 3. Relationship Between RS and Grade and RS and PR% in the Learning Set
 
VariableTotalActual RSP-value
High, N (%)Low, N (%)
PR: progesterone receptor; RS: recurrence score; SD: standard deviation.
Grade
  Grade 168 (18.7%)068 (22.9%)0.00
  Grade 2231 (62.3%)25 (10.8%)206 (89.2%)
  Grade 378 (19.0%)47 (61.8%)31 (9.5%)
PR%, mean (SD)33.7 (35.2)73.7 (29.5)< 0.0001

 

Table 4. PR% Cut-Offs Combined With Grade as Determined by ROC Curves and Those Yielding a 100% Sensitivity
 
VariablePR cut-off (%)TotalRSP-value
HighLow
PR: progesterone receptor; ROC: receiver operating characteristics; RS: recurrence score.
Learning set - all grade (PR cut-off ROC 50)< 5099 (26.4%)43 (63.2%)56 (18.2%)0.000
≥ 50276 (73.6%)25 (36.8%)251 (81.8%)
Learning set - grade 2 (PR cut-off ROC 30)< 3058 (24.9%)22 (84.6%)36 (17.4%)0.000
≥ 30175 (75.1%)4 (15.4%)171 (82.6%)
Learning set - grade 3 (PR cut-off ROC 70)< 7028 (39.4%)24 (57.1%)4 (13.8%)0.000
≥ 7043 (60.6%)18 (42.9%)25 (86.2%)
Learning set - grade 2 (PR at 60)
The sensitivity for this cut-off 60 = 100%
The specificity for this cut-off 60 = 69.1%
< 6076 (35.6%)25 (100%)51 (27.5%)0.000
≥ 60155 (64.4%)0155 (72.5%)
Learning set - grade 3 (PR at 40)
The sensitivity for this cut-off 40 = 100%
The specificity for this cut-off 40 = 65%
< 4022 (23.9%)22 (40.5%)00.000
≥ 4056 (76.1%)25 (59.5%)31 (100%)