World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://wjon.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 3, June 2025, pages 276-285


Adjuvant Therapy Benefits for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive T1aN0M0 Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

↓  Figure 1. The flowchart of the study selection process.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. The forest plot of the pooled hazard ratio for survival outcomes (random-effect model). All statistical tests were two-sided. He A: group of patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy; He B: group of patients who received chemotherapy only; He C: group of patients who received chemotherapy and trastuzumab.
Figure 2.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Patient and Disease Characteristics of Patients With HER2-Positive T1aN0M0 Breast Cancer
 
Study Year Design N Grade, N (%) ER+, N (%)
ER+: endocrine receptor-positive; Group A, B, and C: who received no adjuvant therapy, received chemotherapy alone, and received chemotherapy and trastuzumab, respectively; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MIBC: microinvasive breast cancer; NR: not reported or could not be extracted; TH: paclitaxel + trastuzumab.
Joensuu et al [18] 2003 Retrospective 69 (T1a-b) NR NR
Curigliano et al [19] 2009 Retrospective 85 NR NR
Livi et al [20] 2012 Retrospective 28 NR NR
Gamucci et al [21] 2013 Retrospective 96 (T1a-c) NR NR
Fehrenbacher et al [22] 2014 Prospective, cohort 116 I and II: 60 (52), III: 21 (18), unknown: 35 (30) 60 (52)
Vaz-Luis et al [23] 2014 Prospective, cohort 216 NR 135 (62)
van Ramshorst et al [24] 2016 Retrospective 385 (54 (14%) patients had MIBC) NR NR
Dall et al [25] 2017 Prospective 97 NR NR
de Nonneville et al [26] 2017 Retrospective 138 NR NR
Musolino et al [27] 2017 Retrospective 121 NR NR
He et al [28] 2020 Retrospective 135 I/II/III
Group A: 6 (2.4)/75 (30)/167 (67); group B: 3 (2)/37 (20)/138 (76); group C: 0 (0)/31 (20)/124 (79)
Group A: 158 (63); group B: 99 (49); group C: 96 (61)
Kubo et al [29] 2019 Retrospective 489 NR 178 (36)
Tarantino et al [30] 2024 Phase II, randomized T1a: T-DM1 61, TH 20 NR T1a to T2: 75%

 

↓  Table 2. Frequency of Adjuvant Therapy Administration and the Corresponding Survival Outcomes
 
Study Follow-up, years Adjuvant therapy and survival outcomes, N (%) Comments
No CT or H CT only H only CT and H
BCSS: breast cancer-specific survival; CI: confidence interval; CT: chemotherapy; DDFS: distant disease-free survival; DFS: disease-free survival; ER: endocrine receptor; H: trastuzumab; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival; TH: paclitaxel plus trastuzumab.
Joensuu et al [18] 9.5 0 0 0
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) T1ab: 69 (100)
  DDFS at 9 years (T1a) 100% 0 0 0
Curigliano et al [19] 4.5
  DFS at 5 years
  ER+ 88% Only 25.5% received CT
  ER- 93% Only 43.7% received CT
Livi et al [20] 4.9
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 28 (100) 0 0 0
  DFS at 3 years 100% 0 0 0
  DDFS at 3 years 100%
Gamucci et al [21] 5.6
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 0 0 0 3 (T1a-c) The number in T1a was not reported
  DFS at 5-year 100% All HER2-positive T1a, regardless of adjuvant therapy
Fehrenbacher et al [22] 5.8
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 100 (86.2) 9 (7.8) 1 (0.9) 6 (5.2)
  Locoregional-free survival at 5 years 98% 100% 100% 100%
  DFS at 5 years 97% 100% 100% 100%
  DDFS at 5 years 99% 100% 100% 100%
Dall et al [25] 3.3
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 0 0 0 97 (100)
  DFS at 3 years 100%
  DFS at 5 years 96%
Musolino et al [27] 9.6
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 121 0 0 0
  DFS at 5 years 90%
Kubo et al [29] 6.3
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 369 (75) 58 (12) 23 (5) 39 (8)
  DFS at 3 years 98% HR (95% CI) for treated vs. untreated patients: 1.29 (0.51 - 3.25), P = 0.59 Lack of OS or DFS treatment effect, regardless of ER status
  DFS at 5 years 96%
  OS at 3 years 99.7% HR (95% CI) for treated vs. untreated patients: 1.58 (0.27 - 9.11), P = 0.61
  OS at 5 years 99.1%
He et al [28] 10.25
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 101 (75) 7 (5) 0 27 (20)
  DFS at 10 years 92.6% Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  DDFS at 10 years 94.9% Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  BCSS at 10 years 97.4% Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  OS at 10 years 91.3% Groups A, B, and C: T1a
Tarantino et al [30] 5.8
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)
  iDFS at 5 years
  T-DM1 97.7%
  TH 90%
CT with or without H
Vaz-Luis et al [23] 5.5
  Adjuvant therapy in ER+, N (%) 102 (75) 33 (25)
  DDFS at 5 years 96% 100%
  Adjuvant therapy in ER-, N (%) 49 (60) 32 (40)
  DDFS at 5 years 93% 100%
  OS at 5 years 93% 100%
van Ramshorst et al [24] 5.1
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 357 (93) 28 (7)
  BCSS at 8 years 95% 100% T1a: treated vs. untreated: HR = 0.05, P = 0.62
T1a vs. T1c: HR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.18 - 0.83), P = 0.02
  OS at 8 years 85% 100% T1a: treated vs. untreated: HR = 0.05, P = 0.47
T1a vs. T1c: HR = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34 - 0.97), P = 0.04
Treatment effect on BCSS and OS was similar in T1a, T1b, and T1c
de Nonneville et al [26] No adjuvant: 5.3
Adjuvant: 3.2
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%) 95 (67) 43 (33)
  DFS at 3 years 94% 100%
  DFS at 5 years 91% 85% Treated vs. untreated: P = 0.91