World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://wjon.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 3, June 2025, pages 276-285


Adjuvant Therapy Benefits for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive T1aN0M0 Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The flowchart of the study selection process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The forest plot of the pooled hazard ratio for survival outcomes (random-effect model). All statistical tests were two-sided. He A: group of patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy; He B: group of patients who received chemotherapy only; He C: group of patients who received chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

Tables

Table 1. Patient and Disease Characteristics of Patients With HER2-Positive T1aN0M0 Breast Cancer
 
StudyYearDesignNGrade, N (%)ER+, N (%)
ER+: endocrine receptor-positive; Group A, B, and C: who received no adjuvant therapy, received chemotherapy alone, and received chemotherapy and trastuzumab, respectively; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MIBC: microinvasive breast cancer; NR: not reported or could not be extracted; TH: paclitaxel + trastuzumab.
Joensuu et al [18]2003Retrospective69 (T1a-b)NRNR
Curigliano et al [19]2009Retrospective85NRNR
Livi et al [20]2012Retrospective28NRNR
Gamucci et al [21]2013Retrospective96 (T1a-c)NRNR
Fehrenbacher et al [22]2014Prospective, cohort116I and II: 60 (52), III: 21 (18), unknown: 35 (30)60 (52)
Vaz-Luis et al [23]2014Prospective, cohort216NR135 (62)
van Ramshorst et al [24]2016Retrospective385 (54 (14%) patients had MIBC)NRNR
Dall et al [25]2017Prospective97NRNR
de Nonneville et al [26]2017Retrospective138NRNR
Musolino et al [27]2017Retrospective121NRNR
He et al [28]2020Retrospective135I/II/III
Group A: 6 (2.4)/75 (30)/167 (67); group B: 3 (2)/37 (20)/138 (76); group C: 0 (0)/31 (20)/124 (79)
Group A: 158 (63); group B: 99 (49); group C: 96 (61)
Kubo et al [29]2019Retrospective489NR178 (36)
Tarantino et al [30]2024Phase II, randomizedT1a: T-DM1 61, TH 20NRT1a to T2: 75%

 

Table 2. Frequency of Adjuvant Therapy Administration and the Corresponding Survival Outcomes
 
StudyFollow-up, yearsAdjuvant therapy and survival outcomes, N (%)Comments
No CT or HCT onlyH onlyCT and H
BCSS: breast cancer-specific survival; CI: confidence interval; CT: chemotherapy; DDFS: distant disease-free survival; DFS: disease-free survival; ER: endocrine receptor; H: trastuzumab; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival; TH: paclitaxel plus trastuzumab.
Joensuu et al [18]9.5000
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)T1ab: 69 (100)
  DDFS at 9 years (T1a)100%000
Curigliano et al [19]4.5
  DFS at 5 years
  ER+88%Only 25.5% received CT
  ER-93%Only 43.7% received CT
Livi et al [20]4.9
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)28 (100)000
  DFS at 3 years100%000
  DDFS at 3 years100%
Gamucci et al [21]5.6
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)0003 (T1a-c)The number in T1a was not reported
  DFS at 5-year100%All HER2-positive T1a, regardless of adjuvant therapy
Fehrenbacher et al [22]5.8
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)100 (86.2)9 (7.8)1 (0.9)6 (5.2)
  Locoregional-free survival at 5 years98%100%100%100%
  DFS at 5 years97%100%100%100%
  DDFS at 5 years99%100%100%100%
Dall et al [25]3.3
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)00097 (100)
  DFS at 3 years100%
  DFS at 5 years96%
Musolino et al [27]9.6
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)121000
  DFS at 5 years90%
Kubo et al [29]6.3
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)369 (75)58 (12)23 (5)39 (8)
  DFS at 3 years98%HR (95% CI) for treated vs. untreated patients: 1.29 (0.51 - 3.25), P = 0.59Lack of OS or DFS treatment effect, regardless of ER status
  DFS at 5 years96%
  OS at 3 years99.7%HR (95% CI) for treated vs. untreated patients: 1.58 (0.27 - 9.11), P = 0.61
  OS at 5 years99.1%
He et al [28]10.25
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)101 (75)7 (5)027 (20)
  DFS at 10 years92.6%Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  DDFS at 10 years94.9%Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  BCSS at 10 years97.4%Groups A, B, and C: T1a
  OS at 10 years91.3%Groups A, B, and C: T1a
Tarantino et al [30]5.8
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)
  iDFS at 5 years
  T-DM197.7%
  TH90%
CT with or without H
Vaz-Luis et al [23]5.5
  Adjuvant therapy in ER+, N (%)102 (75)33 (25)
  DDFS at 5 years96%100%
  Adjuvant therapy in ER-, N (%)49 (60)32 (40)
  DDFS at 5 years93%100%
  OS at 5 years93%100%
van Ramshorst et al [24]5.1
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)357 (93)28 (7)
  BCSS at 8 years95%100%T1a: treated vs. untreated: HR = 0.05, P = 0.62
T1a vs. T1c: HR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.18 - 0.83), P = 0.02
  OS at 8 years85%100%T1a: treated vs. untreated: HR = 0.05, P = 0.47
T1a vs. T1c: HR = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34 - 0.97), P = 0.04
Treatment effect on BCSS and OS was similar in T1a, T1b, and T1c
de Nonneville et al [26]No adjuvant: 5.3
Adjuvant: 3.2
  Adjuvant therapy, N (%)95 (67)43 (33)
  DFS at 3 years94%100%
  DFS at 5 years91%85%Treated vs. untreated: P = 0.91